home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1146>
- <title>
- Aug. 29, 1994: Immigration:Time to Lift Cuba Embargo
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Aug. 29, 1994 Nuclear Terror for Sale
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- IMMIGRATION, Page 32
- Is It Time to Lift the Cuban Embargo?
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By J.F.O. McAllister/Washington
- </p>
- <p> In the 1960s Washington hated Fidel Castro so much that the
- CIA fabricated seashells to explode when he was scuba-diving
- and a powder that would make his beard fall out. He and his
- beard survived all those barbs. Today the loathing has softened,
- but its spirit still animates America's punishing economic embargo
- against Cuba, now 32 years old. Virtually all commerce with
- the island is banned. Ships that trade with Cuba cannot visit
- American ports for six months. Most Americans are at least technically
- subject to prosecution for visiting there. Even the U.N. sanctions
- against Saddam Hussein's Iraq permit it to buy food and medicine
- for humanitarian reasons; to get U.S. food and medicine to Castro's
- Cuba, someone has to donate it.
- </p>
- <p> Does this make sense anymore? Except for flooding Florida with
- boat people, Cuba poses no threat to U.S. national security.
- It no longer has a nuclear-armed patron in Moscow buying anti-Yanqui
- mischief with $6 in billion annual aid. The whole world has
- passed by Fidel's moth-eaten socialism.
- </p>
- <p> The Administration argues that isolating Castro is the best
- way to make him democratize, adopt market reforms and compensate
- Americans for property seized during the revolution. Other countries
- trade freely with Havana and have long since struck compensation
- deals for their own seized assets. But with Cuba's economy in
- sugar shock--the yields in cane fields have slumped to levels
- not seen since the 1920s--the embargo's boosters hope it will
- break Castro's back. "Ending the embargo is his No. 1 foreign
- policy priority," says a U.S. official. And what Castro wants,
- Washington opposes.
- </p>
- <p> But that logic ignores what the U.S. has learned about helping
- communist countries feel their way toward freedom--and the
- booming American trade with other Marxist regimes. Washington
- is moving toward full trade and diplomatic ties with Vietnam,
- whose human-rights record is no better than Cuba's. It is holding
- extensive talks with North Korea, the worst troglodyte of all
- Stalinist regimes. And when Bill Clinton extended most-favored-nation
- tariff treatment to Beijing last May, he argued that "the best
- path for advancing freedom in China is for the United States
- to intensify and broaden its engagement with that nation." Why
- shouldn't he treat Cuba the same way? "I think the circumstances
- are different" is the best explanation he could manage last
- week.
- </p>
- <p> The biggest difference is the strength of the conservative and
- wealthy Cuba lobby, which Clinton has courted since the campaign.
- Its leaders got Clinton to ratchet sanctions tighter as the
- price of accepting his new policy on boat people.
- </p>
- <p> Most experts argue that the embargo allows Castro to blame the
- U.S. for his failures and should be modified or dropped. "The
- trade embargo," contends Harvard professor Jorge Dominguez,
- "should be seen as a tool, not an altar in front of which we
- kneel." But for now, Clinton shows no sign of standing up.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-